Practice question
A corporate officer proposes a lawful pre-court compromise of a nonfraud tax violation. The prosecution argues that the offer alone conclusively admits the officer's guilt and that a corporate title alone establishes responsibility. Which principle from Suarez is relevant?
- Every settlement offer conclusively establishes guilt
- Every officer is criminally liable solely from title
- A proposal automatically compels acquittal
- An offer for an offense legally allowed to be compromised is not automatically an implied admission of guilt, and the prosecution must prove the officer's responsibility and the offense's elements
- No evidence rules apply to tax prosecutions
Legal references
- NIRC Sections 204 and 253: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/3896
- Suarez v. People, GR253429, October6 2021, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/oct2021/gr_253429_2021.html
- BIR RMO7-2015: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/69577
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.