Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Institution of Civil Action in Criminal Action

Multiple Choice Easy Jurisprudence

Practice question

Why does acquittal not necessarily erase the taxpayer’s corresponding deficiency-tax liability under E & D Parts Supply?
  1. Because every acquittal is void
  2. Because civil tax liability requires no evidence
  3. Because the prosecutor may disregard final judgments
  4. Because a tax is always a criminal fine
  5. Because the duty to pay tax is imposed by law independently of the alleged offense

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2004/ra_9282_2004.html — RA 9282, section 7(b)(1), corresponding civil action
  • https://lawphil.net/courts/supreme/am/am_05_11_07_cta_2005.html — Revised Rules of the CTA, Rule 9 section 11
  • https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/69095 — People v. Mendez, G.R. Nos. 208310-11 and 208662, March 28, 2023, main opinion
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jan2024/gr_259284_2024.html — People v. E & D Parts Supply, Inc., G.R. No. 259284, January 24, 2024
  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2017/ra_10963_2017.html — RA 10963, section 76 amending NIRC section 254

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.