Practice question
Does merely alleging illegal collection establish the factual predicate for bond dispensation under Pacquiao?
- No; the disputed predicate requires evidentiary determination
- Yes, allegations always conclusively prove facts
- Yes, using capital letters suffices
- Yes, retaining counsel proves illegality
- Yes, every assessment is presumed criminal
Legal references
- Spouses Pacquiao v CTA GR213394 April6,2016 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2016/apr2016/gr_213394_2016.html MAIN preliminary inquiry and security computation.
- RA9282 amending RA1125: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2004/ra_9282_2004.html Section11 as amended.
- NIRC: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8424_1997.html Section218 national collection restriction.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.