Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Topic

Appeal to the CTA En Banc

Page 2 of practice questions on Appeal to the CTA En Banc in Procedure. Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar review.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. For a new-trial motion based on newly discovered evidence, what must ordinarily be shown about discovery under RRCTA Ru… Multiple Choice Easy
  2. A party files an admittedly pro forma Division reconsideration motion and calculates its En Banc deadline as if the mot… Multiple Choice Medium
  3. A party seeks a new trial using records it possessed at trial but deliberately chose not to present. It invokes the new… Multiple Choice Medium
  4. After denial of its first Division reconsideration motion, a civil litigant files an ordinary prohibited second motion … Multiple Choice Hard
  5. A new-trial motion asserts newly discovered evidence but gives no affidavit from the expected witness or authenticated … Multiple Choice Hard
  6. Explain why the legal sufficiency of a Division reconsideration motion matters to a later En Banc appeal deadline. Essay Hard
  7. Discuss the newly-discovered-evidence ground for a Division new-trial motion before En Banc review. Essay Hard
  8. Analyze reliance on an ordinary second Division reconsideration motion to postpone En Banc review indefinitely. Essay Hard