Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Civil Action

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

The government sues on a final assessment for PHP900,000 principal and PHP300,000 penalties. A defendant argues no court can hear it because it is below CTA original jurisdiction. Which is best?
  1. Every sub-million tax claim is legally extinguished.
  2. The less-than-one-million proviso directs the case to the proper regular court; below CTA original threshold does not mean no judicial remedy.
  3. Penalties must automatically be converted into principal.
  4. Only the taxpayer may choose whether any court exists.
  5. The claim must be filed originally in the Supreme Court.

Legal references

  • RA9282 Section7(c), CTA collection jurisdiction: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2004/ra_9282_2004.html
  • RA11576, regular-court jurisdiction amendments: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11576_2021.html
  • People v. Mendez, G.R. Nos.208310-11 and208662, March28,2023, EN BANC MAIN, special tax-collection jurisdiction retained after RA11576: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/69095

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.