Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Destination Principle and Cross-Border Doctrine

Multiple Choice Easy Jurisprudence

Practice question

In Tayam v. Recto's main decision, why does taking eligible tourist-purchased goods out of the Philippines matter to destination-based VAT treatment?
  1. It connects the refund to consumption outside the Philippines.
  2. Foreign passports automatically exempt every local consumption.
  3. The seller necessarily becomes a foreign corporation.
  4. The goods become government property at the airport.
  5. Every foreign-currency purchase is automatically a zero-rated export.

Legal references

  • RA12079, NIRC112-A tourist VAT-refund mechanism: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2024/ra_12079_2024.html
  • Signed2025 IRR of RA12079, Sections3-5: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/100686
  • Tayam v. Recto, G.R.280898, April 22, 2026, EN BANC MAIN decision, destination principle and tourist refunds: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/18/70454

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.