Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Destination Principle and Cross-Border Doctrine

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

A qualifying nonresident tourist pays for accommodation consumed during a Philippine stay and seeks the goods-export refund solely because the tourist later leaves. Which is correct?
  1. Every local hotel stay automatically becomes exported goods.
  2. Leaving the country converts every local service into zero-rated consumption abroad.
  3. A foreign passport cancels every VAT on domestic hospitality.
  4. The tourist goods-refund IRR excludes services such as accommodation; departure does not export the already consumed service.
  5. The hotel automatically becomes a foreign tax authority.

Legal references

  • RA12079, NIRC112-A tourist VAT-refund mechanism: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2024/ra_12079_2024.html
  • Signed2025 IRR of RA12079, Sections3-5: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/100686
  • Tayam v. Recto, G.R.280898, April 22, 2026, EN BANC MAIN decision, destination principle and tourist refunds: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/18/70454

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.