Practice question
A Philippine resident holding a foreign passport seeks the tourist refund for goods taken abroad, claiming the passport alone conclusively satisfies the statutory tourist definition. Which is correct?
- Every foreign passport automatically proves nonresidence.
- The nonresidence requirement must also be met; foreign-passport possession alone does not establish eligibility.
- Every resident can ignore the tourist definition if goods cross a border.
- The refund mechanism applies only to corporations.
- Any trip abroad automatically changes residence permanently.
Legal references
- RA12079, NIRC112-A tourist VAT-refund mechanism: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2024/ra_12079_2024.html
- Signed2025 IRR of RA12079, Sections3-5: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/100686
- Tayam v. Recto, G.R.280898, April 22, 2026, EN BANC MAIN decision, destination principle and tourist refunds: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/18/70454
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.