Practice question
A micro taxpayer invokes the proposed EOPT section 8 language as a blanket exemption from creditable withholding duties. Which is correct in light of the presidential veto?
- The enrolled proposal automatically overrides the veto
- All micro taxpayers have no tax duties
- The veto removed every part of EOPT
- Only the business name matters
- The vetoed exemption cannot be treated as operative merely because it appears in the enrolled text
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2024/ra_11976_2024.html — RA 11976, section 9 amending NIRC section 58 and repeal of section 34(K)
- https://www.dof.gov.ph/newly-signed-ease-of-paying-taxes-act-to-modernize-ph-tax-administration-and-strengthen-taxpayer-rights/ — official DOF confirmation of the section 8 veto
- https://bir-cdn.bir.gov.ph/local/pdf/RMC%20No.%203-2024.pdf — BIR RMC 3-2024 circularizing RA 11976 and presidential veto
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.