Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Basic Principles and Concepts only

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

The parties stipulate that a person has made only a future promise and no completed gift or other taxable transfer has occurred. Can the promise alone be treated as the stipulated completed gift merely because an intended recipient is named?
  1. Yes; naming any hoped-for recipient necessarily completes every transfer.
  2. Yes; every intention automatically transfers legal ownership.
  3. No; because completed gifts can never be taxed.
  4. No; the actual transfer event must be established.
  5. Yes; the donee's preference replaces every transfer requirement.

Legal references

  • NIRC Sections84-85,98 and104, read with TRAIN amendments: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8424_1997.html
  • RA10963, TRAIN, estate and donor tax amendments including Sections99-100: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2017/ra_10963_2017.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.