Practice question
A special-purpose tax fund is earmarked for a project that remains active and unfulfilled. Officials propose using the money for an unrelated project solely because it also has public value. No other lawful constitutional basis is established. Which answer follows ArticleVI Section29(3)?
- Public value alone does not erase the special-purpose restriction while the earmarked purpose remains unfulfilled and unabandoned
- Any public project may automatically receive every special tax fund
- The collector personally owns unused money
- The purpose need never be considered after collection
- All earmarked taxes are necessarily unconstitutional
Legal references
- 1987 Constitution: https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html ArticleVI Section29(3).
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.