Practice question
Which additional standing foundation did Chavez v. PEA emphasize besides its taxpayer characterization?
- Ownership of AMARI shares as an indispensable fact.
- Enforcement by a citizen of constitutional public rights concerning information and national patrimony.
- A requirement that the petitioner personally own every reclaimed parcel.
- Automatic standing for every private commercial disagreement.
- The petitioner's preferred development plan alone.
Legal references
- Pascual v. Secretary of Public Works, G.R. L-10405, December29,1960, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1960/dec1960/gr_l-10405_1960.html
- Chavez v. Public Estates Authority, G.R.133250, July9,2002, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2002/jul2002/gr_133250_2002.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.