Practice question
A bookkeeper accidentally duplicates a lawful deduction, and the taxpayer corrects the mistake when discovered. The examiner proves a deficiency but offers no evidence of deliberate deceit. What is the sound distinction?
- Every deficiency automatically proves evasion
- Correction necessarily cancels the underlying tax
- Only motive matters, never acts
- Mistakes are permanently immune from any tax consequence
- A tax deficiency may require correction without that fact alone proving Toda’s willful evasion factors
Legal references
- CIR v. Estate of Benigno P. Toda, Jr., G.R. No. 147188, September 14, 2004, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/sep2004/gr_147188_2004.html
- CIR v. Arturo E. Villanueva, Jr., G.R. No. 249540, February 28, 2024, main decision, intentional evasion distinguished from error: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/feb2024/gr_249540_2024.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.