Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Compromise and Tax Amnesty

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

During the RA 9480 amnesty period, a qualified taxpayer fully complied with the law's documentary and payment requirements for a covered liability. The BIR nevertheless seeks collection solely on an exclusion added by an administrative circular rather than the statute. Under CIR v. Transfield, which response is correct?
  1. The BIR cannot defeat the statutory amnesty by adding an unauthorized exclusion after full compliance.
  2. The BIR may always add exclusions even if inconsistent with the statute.
  3. Every amnesty is merely an unaccepted compromise offer.
  4. Compliance is irrelevant until Congress individually approves the taxpayer.
  5. The case establishes that every tax in every later year is forgiven.

Legal references

  • CIR v. Transfield Philippines, Inc., G.R. 211449, January 16, 2019 (main decision), RA 9480 amnesty; https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/65000

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.