Philippine Bar review · Topic

Determining Control and Market Dominance

Explore Determining Control and Market Dominance in Competition Law (RA 10667) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under Section 25 of the Philippine Competition Act, what ownership ordinarily creates a presumption that a parent contr…
  2. Assuming the PCC has set no different threshold for the sector, what market share triggers Section 27's rebuttable pres…
  3. Which statement correctly describes the relationship between dominance and liability under the Philippine Competition A…
  4. A owns 40% of B's voting power. A binding agreement gives A authority to appoint and remove a majority of B's board. A …
  5. A firm has 55% of the properly defined relevant market. No different sector threshold applies. It offers evidence of st…
  6. P owns 60% of S's voting power through subsidiaries. In a PCC inquiry P presents documents claiming exceptional circums…
  7. A producer gains 52% of a properly defined market by supplying superior products. No different PCC sector threshold app…
  8. An investor owns 35% of an entity's voting power but, under an enforceable agreement, directs its financial and operati…
  9. A firm has exactly 50% of the relevant market, with no different sector threshold. Explain the presumption and identify…
  10. Compare control of an entity with dominance in a market. Use an example showing why control of a corporation does not b…
  11. Which Section 25 factor can establish control without majority share ownership?
  12. What asset-related consideration appears in Section 25(e)?