Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Per Se and Not Per Se Violations

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

Competitors agree to halt investment in new technology. The agreement is not price fixing or bid manipulation but has the object of substantially restricting competition. Which classification directly applies?
  1. Automatically Section 14(a) bid rotation
  2. No provision can concern technology
  3. Only a merger notification rule
  4. Only an individual abuse case
  5. Section 14(b)(1), which includes controlling technical development or investment with the stated object or effect

Legal references

  • RA 10667, Philippine Competition Act, Sections 4, 14-15 and 24-27: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2015/ra_10667_2015.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.