Practice question
In a non-per-se inquiry, an investigator rejects all evidence of likely future consumer benefits merely because none has yet been realized. What does Section 26(b) require?
- Consideration of actual or potential efficiency gains alongside the alleged substantial impact
- Ignoring every future development
- Automatic acceptance of any claimed benefit
- A rule that every loss of a rival’s sales is unlawful
- No definition of the market
Legal references
- RA 10667, Philippine Competition Act, Sections 4, 14-15 and 24-27: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2015/ra_10667_2015.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.