Practice question
May a subsequent vendor of deceptively clothed goods fall within Section 168.3(a) when it sells with the like deceptive purpose?
- Yes; the text expressly includes such a vendor or agent
- No, only the first manufacturer can ever be liable
- Only if it invented the goods
- Only if the owner consents to deception
- No, because selling is never relevant
Legal references
- RA 8293, IP Code, Sections 138, 147-148, 151-159 and 168: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8293_1997.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.