Practice question
A retailer knowingly sells goods clothed to appear to come from a competitor and does so for that deceptive purpose. It argues it is immune solely because another firm manufactured the wrapping. Which answer follows Section 168.3(a)?
- Manufacture by someone else always immunizes the retailer
- The statute can reach a subsequent vendor selling with the like purpose
- Only the wrapper’s printer can be liable
- All retail resale is lawful regardless of purpose
- Goodwill disappears when goods are resold
Legal references
- RA 8293, IP Code, Sections 138, 147-148, 151-159 and 168: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8293_1997.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.