Practice question
A mark is well-known under the Code and registered in the Philippines. Use on dissimilar services would indicate a connection with the registered owner and likely damage its interests. The user says dissimilarity categorically ends Section 147.2. Which is correct?
- Section 147.2 expressly extends protection on the stipulated conditions despite dissimilarity.
- Protection can never reach dissimilar goods or services.
- Every foreign-famous name qualifies without the stated conditions.
- The user automatically owns the registered mark.
- No connection or damage inquiry is legally relevant.
Legal references
- RA8293, IP Code, Sections147–148 and155–159: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8293_1997.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.