Philippine Bar review · Topic
Patentable vs. Non-Patentable Inventions
Explore Patentable vs. Non-Patentable Inventions in Patents for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under IP Code section 21, a patentable technical solution must satisfy which substantive combination?
- Which subject is expressly excluded as such under section 22.1?
- What does section 22.3 state concerning methods for treating the human or animal body by surgery or therapy and diagnos…
- A claimed technical improvement is new and industrially applicable but is stipulated to be obvious to a person skilled …
- A new surgical instrument is claimed as a product, not as a method of operating on the body. A reviewer rejects it sole…
- Before Applicant A's filing and any claimed priority date, an independent third party publicly discloses the identical …
- A drug patent application claims only a newly identified polymorph of a known substance. The stipulated evidence establ…
- Explain the distinct roles of novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability in section 21. A technical solution …
- Compare a surgical treatment method with a surgical instrument claimed as a product under section 22.3. Explain the sco…
- A drug application claims a mere new form of a known substance without enhanced known efficacy. Explain the drug-specif…
- Which subject is expressly excluded from patent protection by IPCode Section22.5?
- What does IPCode Section22.6 exclude from patent protection?