Practice question
A specified equivalent foreign regulator makes a qualifying fraudulent-misconduct finding within the period. The nominee argues Section 26 can never consider it because it is not a Philippine criminal conviction. Which is best?
- All foreign findings are legally invisible under the text
- Only local campaign endorsements matter
- A foreign finding automatically creates Philippine citizenship
- The nominee’s title controls every qualification
- Paragraph (c) expressly addresses the qualifying foreign findings
Legal references
- RA 11232: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/86463; Sections 22,26.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.