Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Doctrine of Separate Juridical Personality

Multiple Choice Medium Jurisprudence

Practice question

A shareholder’s personal lender seeks to seize a delivery truck owned by the corporation solely because the debtor owns 70% of its shares. No independent basis or piercing ground exists. Which is correct?
  1. Share ownership alone does not make the corporate truck the shareholder’s personal property
  2. The lender automatically owns the truck
  3. A majority shareholder directly owns every corporate asset
  4. Corporate assets are always free for personal creditors to take
  5. The corporation loses personality once a shareholder borrows

Legal references

  • https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/86463 — Republic Act No. 11232, sections 2 and 35
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2013/mar2013/gr_167530_2013.html — PNB v. Hydro Resources Contractors Corporation, G.R. Nos. 167530, 167561 and 167603, March 13, 2013, main opinion

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.