Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Splitting of Deposits

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A depositor's source account above maximum coverage is divided into accounts in unrelated persons' names more than 120 days before closure. The transferees cannot establish the regulatory beneficial-ownership exceptions, and the bank has no required transfer documents at takeover. They argue that being outside 120 days necessarily gives each separate insurance. Applying Linsangan, which answer is best?
  1. Every transfer outside 120 days necessarily earns separate insurance.
  2. The timing automatically proves valid donation documentation.
  3. PDIC may still determine beneficial ownership and consolidate accounts under the applicable rules; being outside that window does not itself prove separate insurance entitlement.
  4. The nominees automatically own the bank's entire estate.
  5. PDIC's insurance ruling necessarily invalidates every alleged civil donation.

Legal references

  • PDIC Charter, as amended through RA 11840, current consolidated text, deposit-splitting provision, https://www.pdic.gov.ph/files/PDIC%20Charter%202022.pdf
  • PDIC Regulatory Issuance 2009-003, Parts III–V, https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/50378
  • Linsangan v. PDIC, G.R. No. 228807, 11 February 2019, https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2019/feb2019/gr_228807_2019.html
  • PDIC, maximum coverage increase effective 15 March 2025, https://www.pdic.gov.ph/files/ccd/PR-038-25%20New%20maximum%20deposit%20insurance%20coverage%20of%20P1%20Million%20takes%20effect%20on%20March%2015.pdf

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.