Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Splitting of Deposits

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A bank officer knowingly helps break an above-limit account into unrelated nominees' accounts, lacking beneficial ownership, within the statutory window to multiply insurance. She argues the anti-splitting prohibition addresses depositors alone. What is the best response?
  1. The Charter expressly addresses participation by bank directors, officers, employees and agents in deposit splitting.
  2. Correct; bank personnel may organize splitting without consequence.
  3. Correct; a bank signature necessarily creates beneficial ownership.
  4. Only the printing company can be responsible.
  5. The prohibition applies only to foreign banks.

Legal references

  • RA 10846, deposit splitting prohibition and definition: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2016/ra_10846_2016.html
  • Linsangan v. PDIC, G.R. No. 228807, February 11, 2019, main decision: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/23/64987
  • RA 11840, Section 4 amending PDIC Charter Section 5(k): https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/95626

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.