Philippine Bar review · Topic

Closure

Explore Closure in Banks in Distress for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Who may summarily forbid a bank from doing business under section 30 upon the statutory report and findings?
  2. Does section 30 require a prior hearing before the specified summary prohibition on business?
  3. Which dormant period is expressly included in amended section 30(a)?
  4. A bank has insufficient realizable assets to meet its liabilities, as determined by BSP on the proper report. Must regu…
  5. A bank says receivership cannot follow closure because no conservator was previously appointed. Which is correct?
  6. A bank temporarily cannot pay solely because extraordinary demands induced by financial panic in the banking community …
  7. A minority holder of 5% of capital seeks ordinary merits review of a section 30 closure months after board receipt, arg…
  8. Identify the principal current section 30 closure grounds and explain their alternative character.
  9. Explain the no-prior-hearing closure rule and its relationship to judicial review.
  10. A bank claims that it must first undergo conservatorship before a section 30 receiver can be designated. Resolve under …
  11. Under amended Section 30, how long must an institution have been dormant to fall within the express dormancy ground?
  12. How must the Monetary Board notify a closed bank’s board of directors of the closure decision under amended Section 30?