Practice question
An employee validly files a good-faith report in regular duties but is separately charged with previously stealing the customer's funds. He claims the filing immunizes the earlier theft. Resolve the safe-harbor issue.
- Protection for making the report does not automatically immunize the independent alleged theft.
- A qualifying report permanently immunizes every earlier act.
- The report transfers the customer's property to the employee.
- Only the customer's nationality controls immunity.
- Safe harbor abolishes every property offense committed by a reporter.
Legal references
- RA 9194, Sections 1-2 and 6, AMLA transaction definitions and Section 9(c) safe harbor: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2003/ra_9194_2003.html
- RA 10365, Sections 1 and 7, covered persons and reporting amendments: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10365_2013.html
- RA 11521, amended covered-person and covered-transaction provisions: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11521_2021.html
- RA 12312, Sections 8 and 17, Anti-POGO Act AMLA amendment: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2025/ra_12312_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.