Practice question
A knowing participant assists another in disguising unlawful proceeds but claims immunity because he did not personally receive the final asset. Which is best?
- Final personal receipt is always indispensable
- Only the original predicate offender can launder
- Section 4 expressly includes aiding, abetting, assisting, or counseling the specified offenses, subject to proof of its conditions
- Any assistant is immune if unpaid
- Only physical cash handlers can offend
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10365_2013.html — RA 10365, sections 4 and 5 amending AMLA sections 4 and 6
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.