Practice question
A wealthy customer makes a relatively small transaction that is inconsistent with the established account profile and refuses proper identification. Explain why financial capacity and a subthreshold amount do not conclusively settle the suspicious-transaction inquiry.
Legal references
- RA 9194, Sections 1-2 and 6, AMLA transaction definitions and Section 9(c) safe harbor: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2003/ra_9194_2003.html
- RA 10927, casino coverage and casino covered-transaction threshold: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2017/ra_10927_2017.html
- RA 11521, amended covered-person and covered-transaction provisions: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11521_2021.html
- RA 12312, Sections 8 and 17, Anti-POGO Act AMLA amendment: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2025/ra_12312_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.