Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Covered Transactions; Suspicious Transactions

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A covered real-estate broker handles a single cash transaction of exactly PHP7.5 million. No suspicious circumstance is present. What is the correct amount-only analysis under RA 11521?
  1. It exceeds the threshold by definition.
  2. The casino PHP5 million rule necessarily controls the broker.
  3. Every broker transaction is excluded from AMLA.
  4. The threshold applies only after criminal conviction.
  5. It does not exceed the real-estate-sector threshold.

Legal references

  • RA 9194, Sections 1-2 and 6, AMLA transaction definitions and Section 9(c) safe harbor: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2003/ra_9194_2003.html
  • RA 10927, casino coverage and casino covered-transaction threshold: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2017/ra_10927_2017.html
  • RA 11521, amended covered-person and covered-transaction provisions: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11521_2021.html
  • RA 12312, Sections 8 and 17, Anti-POGO Act AMLA amendment: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2025/ra_12312_2025.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.