Practice question
A minor under school supervision negligently causes a visitor’s injury during an authorized activity. Those exercising special authority prove the proper diligence required in the particular circumstances. The visitor insists Article 219 imposes strict liability without any defense. Which is correct?
- Article 219 expressly recognizes the proper-diligence defense; the evidence must be assessed rather than imposing automatic strict liability
- Every authorized activity creates irrebuttable liability
- Only the size of the school controls
- Parents automatically become solely liable without any legal inquiry
- The visitor’s assertion makes proof irrelevant
Legal references
- Family Code, Article 219: https://lawphil.net/executive/execord/eo1987/eo_209_1987.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.