Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Specific Instances of Vicarious Liability

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A court considers liability for an eighteen-year-old ward living with a guardian. The guardian argues that the general lowering of majority to eighteen automatically erased the specific responsibility saved for wards below twenty-one. No other defense has yet been decided. Which is correct?
  1. Every eighteenth birthday eliminates the saved provision
  2. RA 6809 Section 3 preserves the referenced guardian responsibility for wards below twenty-one, so age eighteen alone does not resolve the claim
  3. Every guardian is strictly liable regardless of all other facts
  4. Every ward is permanently a minor for all purposes
  5. No law can distinguish emancipation from a specific responsibility

Legal references

  • RA 6809, Sections 1 and 3: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1989/ra_6809_1989.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.