Joint Tortfeasors

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. Under Article 2194, what is the responsibility of two or more persons liable for quasi-delict?
2. Does naming several defendants alone prove that each is liable for quasi-delict?
3. May a claimant recover the same fully compensated injury repeatedly merely because multiple tortfeasors are solidarily …
4. Two negligent actors are duly found liable for one quasi-delict injury of PHP200,000. One pays the full amount validly …
5. A defendant is proved to have had no causal participation and no applicable vicarious or other legal responsibility. Th…
6. Two independent negligent acts combine to cause one injury, and the court finds both defendants legally liable for that…
7. A solidary tortfeasor fully pays the common liability. The claimant then argues that this payment necessarily bars any …
8. Explain why Article 2194 requires an established liability basis rather than merely multiple named defendants.
9. Distinguish solidary collection from double recovery.
10. Does absence of agreement between two negligent actors automatically defeat Article 2194 solidarity after both are foun…
11. Under Article1216, against whom may a creditor proceed on an established solidary obligation?
12. Does an unsatisfied demand against one solidary debtor necessarily bar later demands against the others?