Philippine Bar review · Topic
Remote Cause
Explore Remote Cause in Distinguished from for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Is proximate cause necessarily the event closest in time to the injury?
- Which inquiry distinguishes a merely remote background event from a proximate cause?
- Does proof that an injury would not have occurred “but for” an earlier occasion invariably establish legal proximate ca…
- A negligent failure to provide required safety barriers sets a foreseeable sequence in motion that later injures a part…
- A claimant identifies an old event that merely placed the parties in the same town. A later distinct unrelated efficien…
- A warehouse negligently leaves a heavy rack unstable beside an ordinary work aisle. During expected loading, a worker’s…
- A courier’s harmless delay means a recipient happens to visit a shop the next day. A wholly unrelated independent incid…
- Explain why remoteness is not determined by time alone.
- Distinguish a historical “but for” occasion from legal proximate cause.
- A defendant says only the last actor can be a proximate cause. Evaluate.
- In Abrogar, did mere financial sponsorship by Cosmos establish proximate responsibility for the runner’s death?
- Does the label sponsor itself conclusively resolve a defendant’s causal responsibility in every event?