Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Concurrent Cause

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A contractor leaves an unguarded trench at a busy path. A delivery operator negligently pushes a cart into a pedestrian, who falls into the trench. The evidence establishes both acts combined naturally in the single injury, neither displaced the other, and both actors are liable for quasi-delict. Which is correct?
  1. Only the contractor can ever be causal
  2. Only the cart operator can ever be causal
  3. The lack of agreement defeats concurrent responsibility
  4. Both may be concurrently responsible and Article 2194 supplies solidarity on the stated liability findings
  5. The injury must be split into invented unrelated events

Legal references

  • Civil Code, Articles 2176 and 2194: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/53360

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.