Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Concurrent Cause

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A claimant proves that two defendants independently caused two entirely separate losses and supplies no combined causal contribution to either loss. Does Article 2194 alone establish that each owes both losses?
  1. Yes; multiple defendants always owe every loss.
  2. No; the asserted liability for each injury still requires its substantive causal basis.
  3. Yes; the number of defendants replaces causation.
  4. Yes; all harm in one year is indivisible.
  5. No; Article 2194 can never apply to combined harm.

Legal references

  • Civil Code Articles 2176 and 2194: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html
  • Abrogar v. Cosmos Bottling Company, G.R. No. 164749, March 15, 2017, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr_164749_2017.html
  • Soriano v. Intestate Estate of Diano, G.R. No. 277496, January 20, 2026, main decision: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/70347

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.