Philippine Bar review · Topic
Cause vs. Condition
Explore Cause vs. Condition in Proximate Cause for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does calling negligent conduct a “condition” conclusively eliminate its causal significance?
- Is a stationary obstruction necessarily only a legally harmless background condition?
- What is important beyond the terminology “cause” and “condition”?
- An unlit truck is negligently parked protruding into a night traffic lane. A foreseeable negligent approach leads to im…
- A defect is present at a location but is proved to have played no role in the claimant’s injury, which occurred through…
- A business leaves a slippery spill in an entrance and no warning. A visitor walking normally slips directly on it. The …
- A gate was negligently left unlocked, but the claimant’s injury occurred elsewhere through a distinct unrelated event t…
- Explain why the phrase “passive condition” is not a complete defense.
- Distinguish an operative hazard from a coincidental defect unrelated to the injury mechanism.
- How can foreseeable negligence of another remain within the risk created by an earlier hazard?
- Why is a cause-versus-condition label insufficient by itself?
- Can an omission leave a dangerous condition that remains causally operative?