Philippine Bar review · Topic

Cause vs. Condition

Explore Cause vs. Condition in Proximate Cause for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does calling negligent conduct a “condition” conclusively eliminate its causal significance?
  2. Is a stationary obstruction necessarily only a legally harmless background condition?
  3. What is important beyond the terminology “cause” and “condition”?
  4. An unlit truck is negligently parked protruding into a night traffic lane. A foreseeable negligent approach leads to im…
  5. A defect is present at a location but is proved to have played no role in the claimant’s injury, which occurred through…
  6. A business leaves a slippery spill in an entrance and no warning. A visitor walking normally slips directly on it. The …
  7. A gate was negligently left unlocked, but the claimant’s injury occurred elsewhere through a distinct unrelated event t…
  8. Explain why the phrase “passive condition” is not a complete defense.
  9. Distinguish an operative hazard from a coincidental defect unrelated to the injury mechanism.
  10. How can foreseeable negligence of another remain within the risk created by an earlier hazard?
  11. Why is a cause-versus-condition label insufficient by itself?
  12. Can an omission leave a dangerous condition that remains causally operative?