Liability Despite Absence of Fault or Negligence

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

1. Which grounds does Article 2183 expressly recognize for cessation of responsibility?
2. A household possesses and maintains a dog belonging to an unpartitioned estate. The dog causes proved injury, with no s…
3. A possessor argues that a normally tame dog cannot fall within Article 2183 after it bites a visitor. Is ordinary tamen…
4. A dog maintained by a household escapes and injures a pedestrian. Damage and possession are proved; neither force majeu…
5. An heir living abroad neither possesses nor uses the estate’s dog. Other relatives actually possess and maintain it. Is…
6. Explain why Article 2183 can impose liability despite absence of proved personal negligence, while still requiring proo…
7. A dog belongs to an unpartitioned estate but is possessed and maintained by one household. Explain the significance of …
8. A normally tame dog escapes and causes injury. Explain why neither tameness nor escape alone conclusively defeats the p…