Philippine Bar review · Topic
Acts Contrary to Law
Explore Acts Contrary to Law in Human Relations for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What kind of conduct does Article 20 address?
- Does Article 20 refer only to willful damage and exclude negligent damage?
- What consequence does Article 20 prescribe for the established unlawful damaging conduct?
- A business negligently violates a binding safety law, and that violation causes a customer proven injury. It argues tha…
- A claimant proves a statutory violation but also admits that the violation caused no damage to the claimant. Does Artic…
- A delivery business negligently disregards a mandatory legal safety rule. A separate unforeseeable event wholly unrelat…
- A defendant says Article 20 can never support civil indemnity unless a criminal court has first convicted the defendant…
- State the basic requirements and effect of Article 20.
- Distinguish a statutory violation from proof of compensable damage under Article 20.
- Explain why negligent unlawful conduct can fall within Article 20 without converting every civil case into criminal pro…
- Article20 liability for unlawful damaging conduct is established. Under Article2199’s ordinary rule, what supports the …
- For an established Article20 wrong, does Article2200 limit indemnification exclusively to out-of-pocket loss and catego…