Philippine Bar review · Topic

Acts Contrary to Law

Explore Acts Contrary to Law in Human Relations for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What kind of conduct does Article 20 address?
  2. Does Article 20 refer only to willful damage and exclude negligent damage?
  3. What consequence does Article 20 prescribe for the established unlawful damaging conduct?
  4. A business negligently violates a binding safety law, and that violation causes a customer proven injury. It argues tha…
  5. A claimant proves a statutory violation but also admits that the violation caused no damage to the claimant. Does Artic…
  6. A delivery business negligently disregards a mandatory legal safety rule. A separate unforeseeable event wholly unrelat…
  7. A defendant says Article 20 can never support civil indemnity unless a criminal court has first convicted the defendant…
  8. State the basic requirements and effect of Article 20.
  9. Distinguish a statutory violation from proof of compensable damage under Article 20.
  10. Explain why negligent unlawful conduct can fall within Article 20 without converting every civil case into criminal pro…
  11. Article20 liability for unlawful damaging conduct is established. Under Article2199’s ordinary rule, what supports the …
  12. For an established Article20 wrong, does Article2200 limit indemnification exclusively to out-of-pocket loss and catego…