Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Concept and Elements of Quasi-Delict

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A claimant was injured solely because the claimant’s own negligence was the immediate and proximate cause. The defendant’s alleged negligence is not established as a causal factor. The claimant invokes the contributory-negligence mitigation rule to demand at least some award. Which is correct?
  1. The first paragraph’s bar cannot be replaced by mitigation on these stipulated facts
  2. Mitigation guarantees an award for every self-caused accident
  3. Any injury proves defendant fault
  4. The claimant may choose which causal finding governs
  5. Solidarity always creates a defendant even without liability

Legal references

  • Civil Code RA386: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html Articles1172–1174,2178–2179,2194.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.