Philippine Bar review · Topic
Standard of Care
Explore Standard of Care in Negligence for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What factors does Article 1173 expressly connect to the required diligence? Multiple Choice Easy
- If law or contract states no particular diligence standard, what default does Article 1173 prescribe? Multiple Choice Easy
- Do Articles 1172-1174 have relevance to quasi-delict under Article 2178? Multiple Choice Easy
- A defendant followed a casual personal habit that was plainly inadequate for a dangerous activity in the actual setting… Multiple Choice Medium
- A special law requires a higher care standard for a particular activity. The defendant invokes only the general ordinar… Multiple Choice Medium
- A person safely performs a low-risk task in an ordinary setting. On a later occasion the same task is performed beside … Multiple Choice Hard
- A claimant proves an accident but not a breach of the applicable care standard or a valid presumption. The claimant arg… Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain the contextual negligence standard in Article 1173. Essay Medium
- Distinguish a defendant’s customary routine from proof of legally sufficient care. Essay Medium
- Why does proof of an accident alone not necessarily establish a standard-of-care breach? Essay Medium
- Picart’s reasonable-person inquiry principally asks about prudent conduct from which perspective? Multiple Choice Easy
- Does the emergency rule automatically protect a person whose own negligence created the emergency? Multiple Choice Easy