Practice question
An organizer compares a young first-time participant to an experienced adult instructor and asks the court to presume identical appreciation of a specific danger, despite contrary evidence about the child’s information and experience. What does Abrogar require?
- Examination of the particular participant’s actual comprehension and voluntary exposure
- Automatic expert knowledge for every participant
- Only the instructor’s knowledge matters
- Experience is never relevant
- The child’s age automatically proves acceptance of all risks
Legal references
- Civil Code, Articles 6, 19-21, 27, 32, 430, 1144-1155, 1757-1758 and 2034: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html
- Abrogar v. Cosmos Bottling Co., G.R. No. 164749, March 15, 2017, MAIN decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr_164749_2017.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.