Practice question
A worker follows an obsolete checklist despite a known change making it inadequate. The court finds reasonable care required an added precaution and that its omission caused injury. Can checklist compliance alone defeat the negligence finding?
- Yes; any written checklist grants immunity.
- No; compliance with that checklist is not conclusive proof of legally required diligence.
- Yes; foreseeable changes never matter.
- Yes; only contractual duties can require care.
- No; a checklist makes every accident intentional.
Legal references
- Civil Code Articles 1173, 2176, 2180-2184: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.