Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Requisites for Valid Cancellation; Effect of Failure to Comply

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A Section4 buyer has an expressly agreed ninety-day grace period that is still running. The seller relies on the statutory sixty-day minimum to disregard the remaining agreed protection. What is correct?
  1. The statutory minimum alone does not erase the longer valid agreed grace
  2. Every longer buyer protection is void
  3. Sixty days is always a compulsory cancellation deadline
  4. The seller automatically owns all buyer payments on day sixty
  5. A longer period removes the transaction from RA6552

Legal references

  • RA6552: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1972/ra_6552_1972.html Sections3–5,7.
  • Jestra Development v Pacifico GR167452 January30,2007 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2007/jan2007/gr_167452_2007.html Section4 sequential cancellation requirements.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.