Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Personal Property

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

A seller cancels a covered installment transaction and relies on a forfeiture clause for all installments paid. The buyer proves circumstances making retention unconscionable. The seller says Article 1486 makes every forfeiture clause absolutely valid without review. Which is correct?
  1. Every forfeiture is automatically valid
  2. Article 1486 validates retention only insofar as it is not unconscionable under the circumstances
  3. Every installment must always be refunded in full regardless of circumstances
  4. The clause automatically creates a criminal fine
  5. Only the seller determines unconscionability conclusively

Legal references

  • Civil Code, Article 1486: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/53360

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.