Practice question
An agreement purports to lease consumable goods for ordinary consumption, rather than exhibition or use as an accessory to an industrial establishment. The parties insist that merely naming the transaction a lease removes Article 1645's limitation. Which conclusion is correct?
- A label always overrides Article 1645.
- Every consumable-goods transaction is necessarily a valid lease.
- The described intended consumption falls outside Article 1645's stated lease exceptions; a label does not cure that problem.
- Exhibition and consumption are always legally identical.
- The parties thereby create an inheritance.
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html — Civil Code, Article 1645.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.