Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Right of Redemption vs. Equity of Redemption

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A natural-person mortgagor’s bank mortgage is judicially foreclosed in a case governed by Section47. The creditor says judicial foreclosure always precludes any statutory redemption, regardless of the banking law. Which is correct?
  1. The specific Section47 bank rule must be applied rather than that universal nonbank proposition
  2. Every judicial foreclosure is exclusively governed by Act3135
  3. Section47 never concerns a judicial sale
  4. Only corporations can ever redeem bank collateral
  5. The bank may repeal Section47 by a private notice

Legal references

  • Rules of Court: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html Rule68 Sections2–3.
  • RA8791: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2000/ra_8791_2000.html Section47 redemption amount and bank judicial foreclosure.
  • Spouses Lontoc v Spouses Tiglao GR217860 January29,2024 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jan2024/gr_217860_2024.html Equity and statutory rights distinguished.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.