Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Right of Redemption vs. Equity of Redemption

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

A corporation owns the land mortgaged to a bank. Its president and spouse are individual co-debtors. Following a covered extrajudicial foreclosure, the corporation demands the ordinary one-year period solely because individuals also signed the loan. Which analysis follows Limso?
  1. The presence of any individual debtor always gives corporate property a one-year period.
  2. The land becomes individually owned because the president signed.
  3. The president’s age determines the statutory period.
  4. The corporate ownership of the foreclosed property controls the stated section 47 question; individual co-debtors do not alone remove the shorter juridical-owner rule.
  5. No redemption rule can apply to corporate land.

Legal references

  • https://www.lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html — Rules of Court, Rule 68 sections 2–3.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jan2024/gr_217860_2024.html — Lontoc v Tiglao, GR 217860, January 29 2024, main opinion: equity versus statutory redemption.
  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2000/ra_8791_2000.html — RA 8791, section 47, bank foreclosure and juridical-person exception.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2013/mar2013/gr_195540_2013.html — Goldenway Merchandising v Equitable PCI Bank, GR 195540, March 13 2013, main opinion: earlier registration or three-month limit.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2016/jan2016/gr_158622_2016.html — Spouses Limso v PNB, GR 158622 and consolidated cases, January 27 2016, main opinion: corporate owner despite individual co-debtors.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.