Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Judicial vs. Extrajudicial Foreclosure

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A judicial foreclosure judgment omits the sum due and the Rule 68 payment period. The creditor argues that finality alone makes it immediately executable by sale. Which answer follows Lontoc?
  1. Every omission is cured solely by finality.
  2. The required amount and period must be supplied; an incomplete foreclosure disposition cannot simply be executed as though those commands existed.
  3. The sheriff may invent both terms without court action.
  4. The debtor automatically acquires the creditor’s assets.
  5. The omission converts the judgment into extrajudicial foreclosure.

Legal references

  • https://www.lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html — Rules of Court, Rule 68 sections 2–3.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jan2024/gr_217860_2024.html — Lontoc v Tiglao, GR 217860, January 29 2024, main opinion: Rule 68 sections 2–3.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/jul2017/gr_209452_2017.html — Gotesco Properties v Solidbank, GR 209452, July 26 2017, main opinion: Act 3135 section 3 posting and publication.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2020/sep2020/gr_226272_2020.html — Panacan Lumber v Solidbank, GR 226272, September 16 2020, main opinion: personal-notice stipulation.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/aug2023/gr_228919_2023.html — Palo v Spouses Baquirquir, GR 228919, August 23 2023, main resolution: Act 3135 section 1 expressly granted special power of sale.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.