Practice question
Two persons each claim entitlement to a movable and agree to deliver it to a third person for return to whoever is entitled. Is such disputed ownership alone inconsistent with voluntary deposit under Article1968?
- No; the article expressly contemplates that arrangement
- Yes; rival claims necessarily make every deposit a sale
- Yes; a court order is indispensable for every such agreement
- Yes; the custodian automatically becomes owner
- Yes; the object must be destroyed
Legal references
- Civil Code RA386: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html Articles1965,1968,1996–2003,2007–2009.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.